Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, won’t be President Trump’s nominee to serve as director of national intelligence after all, Trump said on Friday.
Andrew Harnik/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/AP
Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, won’t be President Trump’s nominee to serve as director of national intelligence after all, Trump said on Friday.
Andrew Harnik/AP
Updated at 2:47 p.m. ET
President Trump abruptly dropped his intention to nominate Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, to serve as director of national intelligence on Friday.
Coolness from Senate Republicans and reports in the press about past overstatements about Ratcliffe’s record appear to have prompted the White House to calculate that it was wiser to cut bait now than try to press ahead against those headwinds.
Trump wrote on Twitter that Ratcliffe had been treated “unfairly” in media coverage and that he’d told the congressman it might be easier to just stay in the House.
Our great Republican Congressman John Ratcliffe is being treated very unfairly by the LameStream Media. Rather than going through months of slander and libel, I explained to John how miserable it would be for him and his family to deal with these people….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 2, 2019
Trump also wrote that he would announce another nominee to become director of national intelligence “shortly.”
The position is to become vacant with the resignation of Dan Coats, with whom Trump never developed a rapport.
Tensions between the president and the intelligence community also appear to have worsened over the Ratcliffe episode, as people in the spy world made clear via the newspaper coverage how unqualified they believed he is and how unwelcome he would be atop the sprawling alphabet soup of domestic and foreign spy agencies.
The feeling is clearly mutual: The New York Times reported on Friday that Trump has at least once barred Coats’ deputy, Sue Gordon, from the Oval Office and that the White House might attempt to stop her from serving as the interim DNI during the interregnum after Coats’ departure.
Gordon is an intelligence community lifer with some three decades of experience and has served as the day-to-day, hands-on manager. Her supporters faulted what appeared to be a scheme to deny her at least an interim role in the top job, which they argue is owed her by law.
Senate intelligence committee ranking member Mark Warner, D-Va., told the Times the idea of denying Gordon was “outrageous.”
As for Ratcliffe, he thanked Trump in a Twitter post following the one Trump used to announce he would no longer be nominated. Ratcliffe also said he would have been a candid and professional director of national intelligence, following worries that he was being installed as a political lackey.
I was humbled and honored that the President put his trust in me to lead our nation’s intelligence operations and remain convinced that when confirmed, I would have done so with the objectivity, fairness and integrity that our intelligence agencies need and deserve.
— John Ratcliffe (@RepRatcliffe) August 2, 2019
Senate intelligence committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., said in a statement on Friday that he respected “Ratcliffe’s decision to withdraw.”
Burr also pointed to the team serving now within the office of the director — including Gordon — but said it won’t be sufficient forever.
“As the White House determines its next nominee, I’m heartened by the fact that ODNI has an experienced and capable leadership team to help see it through this transition,” Burr said.
“However, there is no substitute for having a Senate-confirmed director in place to lead our intelligence community. I remain committed to moving the official nomination through regular order once it is submitted to the Senate.”
Ratcliffe’s name never was formally transmitted to the Senate and so the “regular order” process Burr described never got underway. Trump announced his intention to nominate Ratcliffe on Sunday, following his TV appearances and questioning in the House for former special counsel Robert Mueller.